A detailed comparison of CockroachDB and Supabase to help you choose the right tool for your needs.
Distributed SQL database for cloud-native applications.
| Plan | CockroachDB | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | ✓ 10 GiB free | ✓ 500MB DB, 1GB storage, 50K auth users |
| Lowest Paid | Usage-based | $25/mo |
| Enterprise | Custom pricing | Custom |
| Feature | CockroachDB | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Distributed SQL | ✓ | — |
| PostgreSQL Compatible | ✓ | — |
| Horizontal Scaling | ✓ | — |
| Multi-Region | ✓ | — |
| Automatic Replication | ✓ | — |
| Built-in Resilience | ✓ | — |
| Postgres database | — | ✓ |
| Authentication | — | ✓ |
| Realtime subscriptions | — | ✓ |
| Storage | — | ✓ |
| Edge functions | — | ✓ |
| Vector embeddings | — | ✓ |
| Row level security | — | ✓ |
| REST API | — | ✓ |
| GraphQL | — | ✓ |
| Dashboard | — | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rating | ⭐ 4.2 | ⭐ 4.6 |
Choose CockroachDB if: You need applications requiring distributed, resilient sql databases. CockroachDB excels with its distributed + sql and postgresql compatible.
Choose Supabase if: You need developers wanting an open-source backend with real postgres power. Supabase stands out with its generous free tier and real postgres.
Best free option: Both CockroachDB and Supabase offer free tiers. CockroachDB offers "10 GiB free" while Supabase offers "500MB DB, 1GB storage, 50K auth users".
It depends on your needs. CockroachDB is better for applications requiring distributed, resilient sql databases, while Supabase is better for developers wanting an open-source backend with real postgres power. Both are excellent tools rated 4.2 and 4.6 respectively.
CockroachDB starts at Usage-based while Supabase starts at $25/mo. Both offer free tiers.
Most tools offer import/export features to help you migrate. We recommend trying Supabase's free tier before fully committing to a switch.
Join our weekly ToolSwitcher digest for free alternatives, cost-cutting playbooks, and curated tool deals.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.