A detailed comparison of Keycloak and Okta to help you choose the right tool for your needs.
Identity and access management platform for secure authentication.
| Plan | Keycloak | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | ✓ Fully open source | ✗ No |
| Lowest Paid | Free (self-hosted) | $2/user/mo |
| Enterprise | Red Hat SSO (paid) | Custom pricing |
| Feature | Keycloak | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| SSO | ✓ | — |
| Identity Brokering | ✓ | — |
| Social Login | ✓ | — |
| User Federation | ✓ | — |
| Admin Console | ✓ | — |
| LDAP/AD Integration | ✓ | — |
| Single Sign-On | — | ✓ |
| Multi-Factor Authentication | — | ✓ |
| Universal Directory | — | ✓ |
| Lifecycle Management | — | ✓ |
| API Access Management | — | ✓ |
| Advanced Server Access | — | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | ✗ |
| Rating | ⭐ 4.2 | ⭐ 4.4 |
Choose Keycloak if: You need organizations wanting self-hosted open-source identity management. Keycloak excels with its fully open source and feature-complete iam.
Choose Okta if: You need enterprise identity and access management. Okta stands out with its industry leader in identity and extensive app integrations (7000+).
Best free option: Keycloak offers a free tier (Fully open source).
It depends on your needs. Keycloak is better for organizations wanting self-hosted open-source identity management, while Okta is better for enterprise identity and access management. Both are excellent tools rated 4.2 and 4.4 respectively.
Keycloak starts at Free (self-hosted) while Okta starts at $2/user/mo. Keycloak also has a free tier.
Most tools offer import/export features to help you migrate. We recommend trying Okta's trial before fully committing to a switch.
Join our weekly ToolSwitcher digest for free alternatives, cost-cutting playbooks, and curated tool deals.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.