A detailed comparison of Lever and Greenhouse to help you choose the right tool for your needs.
Recruiting software platform for structured hiring and candidate tracking.
| Plan | Lever | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Lowest Paid | Contact sales | Custom |
| Enterprise | Custom pricing | Custom |
| Feature | Lever | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| ATS | ✓ | — |
| CRM | ✓ | — |
| Nurture Campaigns | ✓ | — |
| Diversity Insights | ✓ | — |
| Interview Scheduling | ✓ | — |
| Analytics | ✓ | — |
| Applicant tracking | — | ✓ |
| Interview scheduling | — | ✓ |
| Candidate scoring | — | ✓ |
| Reporting | — | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Rating | ⭐ 4.2 | ⭐ 4.4 |
Choose Lever if: You need companies wanting relationship-driven recruiting. Lever excels with its combined ats + crm and strong candidate nurturing.
Choose Greenhouse if: You need medium to large companies with structured hiring needs. Greenhouse stands out with its structured hiring process and great reporting.
It depends on your needs. Lever is better for companies wanting relationship-driven recruiting, while Greenhouse is better for medium to large companies with structured hiring needs. Both are excellent tools rated 4.2 and 4.4 respectively.
Lever starts at Contact sales while Greenhouse starts at Custom. Neither offers a free tier.
Most tools offer import/export features to help you migrate. We recommend trying Greenhouse's trial before fully committing to a switch.
Join our weekly ToolSwitcher digest for free alternatives, cost-cutting playbooks, and curated tool deals.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.