A detailed comparison of Sourcegraph Cody and Cursor to help you choose the right tool for your needs.
AI coding assistant that understands your entire codebase for contextual help.
| Plan | Sourcegraph Cody | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | ✓ Free for individuals | ✓ 2,000 completions/mo |
| Lowest Paid | $9/user/mo | $20/mo |
| Enterprise | Custom pricing | $40/user/mo |
| Feature | Sourcegraph Cody | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Codebase-aware AI | ✓ | — |
| Code generation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Code explanations | ✓ | — |
| Refactoring | ✓ | — |
| Multiple LLMs | ✓ | — |
| IDE plugins | ✓ | — |
| AI autocomplete | — | ✓ |
| AI chat | — | ✓ |
| Codebase awareness | — | ✓ |
| Multi-file editing | — | ✓ |
| VS Code compatible | — | ✓ |
| Cmd-K editing | — | ✓ |
| Import extensions | — | ✓ |
| Custom models | — | ✓ |
| Privacy mode | — | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | ✗ |
| Rating | ⭐ 4.1 | ⭐ 4.5 |
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if: You need developers working with large codebases. Sourcegraph Cody excels with its codebase context and multiple llms.
Choose Cursor if: You need developers wanting ai-native coding. Cursor stands out with its powerful ai features and vs code familiar.
Best free option: Both Sourcegraph Cody and Cursor offer free tiers. Sourcegraph Cody offers "Free for individuals" while Cursor offers "2,000 completions/mo".
It depends on your needs. Sourcegraph Cody is better for developers working with large codebases, while Cursor is better for developers wanting ai-native coding. Both are excellent tools rated 4.1 and 4.5 respectively.
Sourcegraph Cody starts at $9/user/mo while Cursor starts at $20/mo. Both offer free tiers.
Most tools offer import/export features to help you migrate. We recommend trying Cursor's free tier before fully committing to a switch.
Join our weekly ToolSwitcher digest for free alternatives, cost-cutting playbooks, and curated tool deals.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.