A detailed comparison of Workable and Greenhouse to help you choose the right tool for your needs.
Recruiting software platform for structured hiring and candidate tracking.
| Plan | Workable | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | ✓ Free trial | ✗ No |
| Lowest Paid | $149/mo | Custom |
| Enterprise | Custom pricing | Custom |
| Feature | Workable | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| ATS | ✓ | — |
| AI Sourcing | ✓ | — |
| Interview Management | ✓ | — |
| Offer Management | ✓ | — |
| Onboarding | ✓ | — |
| HR Management | ✓ | — |
| Applicant tracking | — | ✓ |
| Interview scheduling | — | ✓ |
| Candidate scoring | — | ✓ |
| Reporting | — | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✗ | ✗ |
| Rating | ⭐ 4.2 | ⭐ 4.4 |
Choose Workable if: You need growing companies needing recruiting + basic hr. Workable excels with its strong ats features and ai-powered sourcing.
Choose Greenhouse if: You need medium to large companies with structured hiring needs. Greenhouse stands out with its structured hiring process and great reporting.
Best free option: Workable offers a free tier (Free trial).
It depends on your needs. Workable is better for growing companies needing recruiting + basic hr, while Greenhouse is better for medium to large companies with structured hiring needs. Both are excellent tools rated 4.2 and 4.4 respectively.
Workable starts at $149/mo while Greenhouse starts at Custom. Workable also has a free tier.
Most tools offer import/export features to help you migrate. We recommend trying Greenhouse's trial before fully committing to a switch.
Join our weekly ToolSwitcher digest for free alternatives, cost-cutting playbooks, and curated tool deals.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.